Archive for the ‘Politics’ Category

Official Police Complaint

Saturday, July 10th, 2010

Anarchists had run amok downtown Toronto during the G20 summit, destroying police cars and doing extensive damage to shop windows.Now, believe it or not, it is the police on the defensive for their overwhelming use of force under attack by the anarchists lawyers and disenchanted “public.” Well I thought, who the hell will hold the anarchists and make them explain why they did what they did?

Summary of my complaint to the Toronto Police Board.

I made a same formal complaint also to the Ontario Ombudsman. The complaint is in essence as follows: 

The Toronto Police Services Board does not include the verbatim transcripts (rationalizations) anarchists give for their destructive behavior.  The police do not show what the ideas (websites, telephone calls, words and propaganda anarchists relied on that motivated their destructive behavior. This would help the citizens of Toronto understand why and how these criminals came to be.

If this isn’t understood, a review hearing aimed only at police “harassment”  will be a mere sounding board if all facts are not exposed.

Such destructive ideas that anarchist rely on cannot be stopped by legal force, which would be totalitarian, but stopped by exposure and letting reasonable citizens understand the dangers their own youngsters are in. With exposure, individual citizens can take up the responsibilities of correcting the ideational errors.

Report This Post

G20 Individual Rights Walk and Promotion

Monday, June 28th, 2010

The few friends and I that promoted individual rights at the G20 are ok. We got away from the crowd of protesters a few mere minutes before the ridiculous “professional” anarchists began breaking windows and taunting the police.  We were right in the middle of that crowd promoting America’s Tea Party and individual rights, then the ”black block” as the tactic is called – started. We were getting squeezed in as they donned their handkerchiefs and started staring down and yelling back at the line of police guards. They ended up destroying property and torching police cars.

However, we had our say about individual rights as the basis of freedom and our promotion of America’s Tea Party movement, with about 7 local media interviews: Chezk, Polish, Epoch Times, “Now” magazine, etc. There were also university researchers, and a video interviewer that will put my message on Youtube. I’ll be informed later about that.

The Epoch Times (Chinese dissidents against communism) did the most thorough interview with me.

The friends that made it there stuck with me all the way and I’m proud of them. Our walk began at noon. It was raining heavily and we got soaked, but kept on. The rain dissipated about an hour and a half later and we got busy challenging the communists, socialists and other “entitlement” groups there by waving the American flag and handing out, “What the Tea Party Movement Must Stand For.”

A lady named Elizabeth” was really great. She did a lot of distribution and talking to people.

We were right in the middle of all the socialists and communists and unions proudly waving the Tea Party message, the Individual Rights message and distributing the Ayn Rand Center’s message on the Tea Party.

A lot of on-lookers took pictures of the American flag and our Tea Party’s sign, “America was instituted to secure Individual Rights!” The other side of the sign stated, “Remember Tea Party America.” I alternated the sign so most people would see both sides.

I just hope enough got the message. I think so since I took a lot of insults from the socialists. People would come at me saying. ” Your a ##*#! racist. You’re pathetic! “You’re in the wrong ##!!++# country!  Etc.”

The police were there to keep order. They’d told me to “keep moving” since I stayed too long in one place, some people would start chanting against me, “Tea Party Bulls##t! Tea Party Bullsh##!” I simply ignored them since I was there to promote the Tea Party and individual rights to on-lookers, not get entangled with hardcore socialists. What we are the most encouraged about were the interviews. I hope they air.

At the end of our walk and before we left, I waved my flag and the same message in Sid Ryan’s union crowd. He is Canada’s most famous union spokesman. He was making a pro union speech. I get quiet and personal satisfaction from this since I had worked hard at ousting a Social democrat years ago, by writing the then Premier, Mike Harris for individual rights. Mike Harris had actually written legislation for individual rights to be implemented into Ontario’s union position. Again years later, union leades still decry how Mike Harris had “done incredible damage to the union by this code.”  

The anarchists began breaking windows and taunting the police mere minutes after we moved away from the “professional” rioters.  

It’s our first time being this open and public so I will look for any Tea Party and individual rights message to show on some of the local media I mentioned. 

At the interviews I repeated basically the same ideas as the following.

Interviewer: Your message caught my attention. What brings you here?

Ted: I’m here to bring awareness to the most evaded and neglected political principle of our time, both by protesters and politicians. that principle is individual rights! The various groups here say they are fighting for freedom but one cannot be fighting for freedom unless one has the principle of individual rights as its base. Individual rights is not only the most neglected political principle, but the most critical political principle, that’s very much needed today.

Individual rights  means protection against intrusive government and against the majority. It also means protection from entitlement, from the government confiscating my money for altruistic causes, which many groups here are demonstrating for.

Interviewer: But your message is American. Why are you showing that message here?

Ted: Both Canada and the United States, in fact all countries need the principle of individual right in order to have freedom. In Canada the principle of individual rights is implicit, but in the United States, it is explicit, but all countries need the principle in order to be free. Another reason is I just love America.  

The “NOW” magazine interviewer surprised me by saying, “This is a socialist crowd, what are you doing here?”  (NOW magazine has been an openly socialist promoter since its inception).

Ted: That’s why I’m here to show an alternative, to show the importance of individual rights, property rights and the right to the pursuit of happiness, of one’s own produce, one’s own treasures.

Some student protesters were seriously curious about the Tea Party sign and took the time to talk to me, albeit with their university induced ideas of “social justice.” They talked about their very honest concerns about rights in their area, women’s rights for example. I simply told them group rights are a collectivist idea and for anyone to talk of minority rights, one had to recognize the greatest minority of all: the individual. 

All of the interviewers and curious took a copy of, “What the Tea Party Must Stand For.”

I was very glad to be able, again to promote Ayn Rand’s ideas. It is a lot of work to stay focused, not get riled when verbally attacked, and to get key ideas stated properly. However, it is very much worth it in this very real fight for freedom.

Report This Post

Tomorrow may possibly be the day America votes for socialism.

Sunday, March 21st, 2010

I have written many emails to Governors, Senators and representatives against the soon to be voted Obama health care bill.

Some representatives argued but I gave moral reasons why the bill is destructive of the rights of doctors, patients and citizens. No matter how one looks at it, Government intrusion into health care is  growth of socialism.

The American people  have finally woken up in a spontaneous burst of “Tea Party” organization. These sprang explosively to fight the health care bill.

But it is more than that.

The Ayn Rand Institute has long worked on providing the intellectual ammunition for this needed change.

America The Beautiful

 With so many issues to be angry about, the Tea Partiers need a direction, a central theme to rally for. It cannot be religion, for religious morals are the undercurrent that got America in trouble in the first place with its compassionate, legal dictates  forcing citizens to sacrifice ever more of their hard earned produce.

Forced distribution angers Americans enough to organize and march on Washington – 25,000 in an instant, when needed, as today. Today is the last day until the expected vote for or against the health care bill tomorrow. Americans will be there to protest if the bill passes. Legal preparations are already underway to fight the health care bill passage. The “reconciliation process” is one way. Legal challenges to mandatory insurance is another. Several western states are already drafting legislation to protect their individuals from the insurance requirements.  

However, I would not be doing the Tea Party any justice if I didn’t name the barely hidden ogre that is overtaking America: Fascism,  for that is what over-riding (trampling) individual rights in favour of national schemes is.  That is the kind of socialism emerging.

The Furor, if he were alive today, would nod in agreement at what the Republican and Democratic governments have created today. 

The health care bill is also massive growth. Some estimate 25% growth of government in the land of the free.

In specifics, doctors will lose their rights to doctor as they see proper, insurance will become mandatory with escalating fines to the resistant – and greatly diminishing freedom to innovate new insurance schemes. Politicians perversly see government insurance  as “competing” that will bring down health costs.

From Charles E. Schumer, New York State Senator,  ”the creation of new “Exchanges” through health care reform, in which insurance companies could sell affordable health insurance to individuals and small businesses. In these Exchanges, a not-for-profit health insurance company, which would compete on a level playing field with existing private health insurance plans, would help to lower premiums and exert downward pressure on the premiums of existing insurance plans.”

American politicians like this one ignore reducing regulations that hinder competition between states, plan the implementation of greater controls and interventions, and refuse to see the difference between force and voluntary, private exchange of goods and services all the while, riding on the virtues of capitalism.

The American constitution is itself  in serious danger of being forcibly pushed out of existence. American citizens are rising up.

I will be there along side Americans – fighting for a better, socialist free future.

Report This Post

Multiculturalism Kills.

Thursday, January 3rd, 2008

I sent the following to my local Federal member of parliament and Provincial Premier, Dalton Mcguinty. It concerns a young teenager (Aqsa Parvez)in Canada who was murdered by her family and an attempted mis-lead by her brother when the police came to the cultural crime scene.The young girl was murdered (choked to death) by her father forrefusing to wear areligeous head covering. She had resisted before with no one to turn to inmulticultural Canada.

******************

Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2007 13:26:32 -0500

Dear Honourable ColleenBeaumier, (Federal MP)

Aqsa Parvez (news) was an innocent teenager who wanted to be free. It was unnecessary she die for simply wanting a better life. That is obvious. To make it clear, Aqsa Parvez chose modern dress, modern ways, (i.e. rationality) over primitive religious mores with its senseless traditions.

I’m writing you because I wholeheartedly disagree with the role multiculturalism plays in apologizing for collective and racist atrocities, including this one now.

There is nothing moral about multiculturalism.

Canada’s multiculturalism is essentially no different than the late, mighty, United Soviet Socialist Republic’s march into the future! Do you remember their visions and dreams of equality? Canada’s multiculturalism is morally no different in its equalitarianism than Nazi Germany’s sense of right and wrong, “Every citizen shall have bread, and every maiden shall have a husband.”

Multiculturalism however is shorn of idealism and is crude in its collectivism: Blatant race promotion. (See Canada’s Multiculturalism Act).

However, the person is what is important. The single, individual, human being is what is most important, – not any collective – for any reason. The “I” must reign supreme, protected, promoted, and – sovereign – above any “we”.

Had this been true, immigrants would be better off. That’s why they come to Canada – to change, to expect something better than stultifying religious mores, senseless traditions and corrupt political systems.

Had individualism and not multiculturalism been promoted and implemented in Canada, Aqsa Parvez would likely be alive and protected by this rationality. She would likely have been encouraged by her father to seek independence, and not been killed for it. Rational values promote life.

As a citizen of Canada to your responsible position, I’m going to ask two things of you:

  1. You be honest. It takes honesty to recognize the individual is the fundamental political unit.
  2. Fight for individualism. Ignore the old political hacks and out of touch academics. Aqsa Pervez and other kids like her are not to be betrayed.

If you wish any help from me, I’ll willingly do what I can to help abolish Canada’s multiculturalism and laws.

Please contact me below.

Ted Harlson

Report This Post

Open letter to my Government.

Saturday, June 30th, 2007

To my Prime Minister and localgovernment representatives. Idon’t like this so called “low intensity warfare against terrorism.” It isn’t right. Fighting war in a straightjacket of altruism is just asdestructive as governmentssingle minded obsession with global”competativeness” – in a straightjacket of sacrifice to the “environment.” Both are anti – freedom and very destructive. I’ve mailed this letter to my Prime Minister and several Senators in my Province.

DearPrime Minister, House of Commens, Senators, I’m concerned today’s war on terrorism is a pretense. My overall sense tells me our brave soldiers are dying needlessly. My early years in school, talking to older people about World War II, and reading of better library books, I see today’s war is not being fought with the political goal to win by decimating the enemy: Totalitarian Islam. World War II leadership identified the enemy! Society then had a “Kill the bastards, every one of them” attitude and the military pushed hard against Nazi Germany and Shinto, kamikaze Japan. Our leaders knew who and what the enemy was and did not side with them by feeling for them as the attitude is today. Every effort was made in WWII to utterly destroy the enemy; destroy their generals and politicians; destroy their soldiers and spies; destroy their supporters of every kind in their cities, hiding places, including civilian women and children.

By contrast, today’s compassionate welfare type effort against terrorism and not its root, totalitarian Islam, is undermining the war and emboldening the entire Middle East, not to mention corrupt Russia and communist China. Today’s so called “compassion” is creating needless deaths and a darker future.

Please, let’s stop valuing the lives of enemy countries like Afghanistan, Iraq, and Iran over the lives of our own courageous soldiers. Welfare and war is a hypocritical mix, – and I think people sense it.While many Canadians do not want the war to continue, I believe they simply do not like this hypocritical method of current politics to war. If a clear goal to kill and utterly destroy the states that sponsor terrorism is not implemented, the tactical, “war against terrorism” will keep losing ground here and abroad.

Let us determine to retaliate against the Islamic threat by killing 100,000 totalitarian supporters for each and every single Canadian soldier or Canadian civilian killed or held hostage. It is this kind of moral clarity that is needed to properly fight – and win – this war.

Let us fight against this barbaric, religious tyranny and not sacrifice one more soldier needlessly. Remember what WWII general George Patton stated, “It’s not your patriotic duty to die for your country. It’s your patriotic duty to make the other damn bastard die for his!”

If Canada’s goal is not to quickly and completely decimate the Islamic threat, then the greatest disrespect and dishonor is returned to every brave soldier and every brave soldier’s family who has believed in the West and its secular foundations of life.

Ted

Report This Post

Multi-culturalism’s affront.

Wednesday, June 20th, 2007

Ayn Rand wrote when a man, or nation is facing bankruptcy, it has two choices. Work to rebuild from scratch if necessary or perish. She then goes on to explain howAmerica is taking the wrong one by not facing the problem and re-building.

When Ayn Rand wrote about modern “intellectuals” boasting of man’s impotence, and self abasement, in the face of primordial brutes, I saw so clearly the multi-cultural effront. Canada is seriouslyintellectually bankrupt.

Intoday’s modern society of fuel efficient vehicles, men in space, computers that have cut communication cost to 1/100th of their original cost, – there are still men and women in centuries old garb, turbans and ancient head wraps who areoblivious to what makes their survival possible. These old collectivists are growingenclaves in the middle of proud, free wheeling entrepreneurs in modern suits! The slow but sure march of dark age mentalities aresanctioned by Canada’s constitution and laws. Theold garbs worn are not merely symbolic, but reflective of a mindset of ancient collective and stagnating ways, filling the vacuum intellectuals have not identified, – civilized reality.

Report This Post

CBC, seasoned Fifth Columnist’s?

Tuesday, March 20th, 2007

The following Iemailed todayto the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation in answer to their latest “documentary” entitled, “The Ground Truth.’ This,was as an attempt to “bring the soldiers back home.”But it’s much worse than that.

————————————————————
Canadian Broadcasting Corporation,
Congratulations on your documentary, “The Ground Truth.” the stories of American soldiers in Iraq. Each one of you is responsible for upholding your fine tradition of undermining America through the human (i.e. emotional) perspective.
Congratulations on selecting stories and pictures based on concretes without adherence to principles. A more thorough, one sided, undermining the war against Islamic totalitarianism could not have been accomplished.
I now look at the barbarians you’ve emboldened; to the Arab and Persian race for nuclear weapons, to growing communist pacts, and to the softened mush you endlessly pump that makes it all possible.
Your journalistic content is utterly and thoroughly designed to destroy America from within. This by never allowing one single proper principle to enter your office or pages in print.
Congratulations on attaining the mature status of killers of mankind! Each one of you has less excuse than barbarians. Ted Harlson.

——————————————————————————————-

Report This Post

A Balkanized Canada

Friday, November 24th, 2006

Canada’s Prime Minister announced the recognition of it’s french Province, “A Nation in Canada”, to a standing ovation in the House of Commens.

This is a major historical break from a “one Canada” concept, where now the idea of Canada has expired.

The Quebec Bloc leader, Gilles Duceppe, immediately pushed his advantage, “”Nations” he said, “have rights.” When Quebec again seeks to separate and Canada tries to stop it, the Quebeckers will claim this right. What will Canada then say to “a Nation?”

At root of this inevitable separation is racism, evaded, unspoken, but obvious. At this announcement, Gilles Duceppe stated, “We are what we are” meaning a distinct french race and culture. This official separation is not about freedom, independence, or throwing off oppression but pandering to plain ordinary racism.

These are the logical downsteps to Canada’s multi – racial constitution – a recognitionof “peoples”, not individuals before the law. This is Pierre Elliot Trudeau’s personal racist patriated agenda.

Only America’s constitution has the necessaryprinciples to fight back and institute sanity. Long live individual rights!

As an add on, I’ll refer you to the AynRand site on this topic:

http://www.aynrand.org/site/PageServer?pagename=media_topic_multiculturalism

Report This Post

At a festival

Friday, June 23rd, 2006

I came across a Philippine festival in Toronto, and noticed a booth wherea fewChinese women were displaying, “Nine Commentaries on The Communist Party.” I was about to get angry and find a way to get the booth kicked out but, of course checked first what it was. I thought it might be promoting socialism.

Remarkably, it was nine essays exposing communist Chinese atrocities since the birth of the Chinese communist Party. I took the booklet and am reading it along with the newspaper given me. I find it amazing that a clear and honest account of collectivism is shown in today’s lukewarm, fence – sitting language today! Itis very enlightening. The reasonthe booklet is hard hitting is just because it tells the truth. Here is just one tiny tidbit on the, Nine Commentaries…

ON THE TYRANNY OF THE CHINESE COMMUNIST PARTY

“When speaking about tyranny, most Chinese people are reminded of the Qin Dynasty…whose the oppressive court burnt philosophical books and buried Confiucian scholars alive…[The Emporer] wasted human labor to glorify himself; brutal torture under harsh laws and punishing even the offender’sfamily members and neighbors; and controlling peoples minds by blocking all avenues of free thinking and expression by burning books and even burying scholars alive…prohibiting freedom of thought on a massive scale…[those] who criticised the government were killed.

TODAY, the Chinese communist Party (CPP) violence and abuses are even more severe than those of the tyrannical Qin Dynasty.”

This was/is produced by the “Epoch Times.”

On November 2004, “The Nine Commentaries On The Communnist party”was published and distributed in Hong Kong. 30,000 copies, were gobbled up immediately, then published 30,000 more. In two hours it wasÂdistributed.The next day, 60,000 copies went quickly, so 250,000 copies were printed and was gone in less than four hours! In all, 600,000 copies were distributed and readby a population of six million. One in ten. Also, 40,000 Chinese tourists come from the mainland every day and read the booklet.

Epoch times calls this “Juiping” (Joeping) – an uncensored history of the Chinese Communist Party…and all the enormous crimes it has committed.

Themaindrawback I’d mention is that it is biased in favour of religeon – Falun Gong. This undermines it’s main, but moral expose of communism today. It is remarkable that a clear, and honest account of communism is told that makes western politicians quibbling compromisers and appeasers.

Report This Post


Report This Blog